Background on Purging Factor Calculation for your Risk Assessment

The name Dr. Andrew Teasdale @AndyT is probably familiar to you in this Nitrosamines space if you are new to it… But Dr. Teasdale’s contribution to the Mutagenic impurity control came earlier as the mastermind of the ‘purge factor calculations’.

In a series of early papers, Dr. Teasdale proposed The concept of predicting the clearance of potential mutagenic impurities (PMIs) without experimental measurements. He proposed a systematic approach for PMI purge prediction based on the interrelationship of the physicochemical properties of the impurity and the manufacturing process conditions to which the impurity is exposed. A scoring system was used to understand the extent of the PMI removal through evaluation of the process parameters and the physicochemical properties of the PMI (reactivity, solubility, and volatility). The concept of evaluating PMI-related risk based on process knowledge was later incorporated into current regulatory thinking. ICH M7 explicitly cited this semiquantitative approach and has been widely applied across the industry. The strategy is underpinned by the expertise of the individual or group that performs the risk assessment. It was believed that the utility and consistency of this predictive approach could be further augmented by the development of a standardized in silico system, which is available today.

I have seen this purge prediction approach beautifully applied in many nitrosamine-generating or high-risk syntheses. In peer-reviewed publications, it has not only proven its effectiveness in determining the risk of nitrosamine formation but has also been validated with experimental data.

Learn more about it:

Control of Mutagenic Impurities: Survey of Pharmaceutical Company Practices and a Proposed Framework for Industry Alignment

Access: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.0c00517

Evaluation and Control of Mutagenic Impurities in a Development Compound: Purge Factor Estimates vs Measured Amounts

Access: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.5b00263

Risk Assessment of Genotoxic Impurities in New Chemical Entities: Strategies To Demonstrate Control

Access: https://doi.org/10.1021/op300268u

Assessment of Predictivity of Semiquantitative Risk Assessment Tool: Pazopanib Hydrochloride Genotoxic Impurities

Access: https://doi.org/10.1021/op400139z

Leveraging ICH M7 Control Options 3 and 4: Discussion and Clarification Using Industrial Case Studies

Access: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00207

Establishing Best Practice for the Application and Support of Solubility Purge Factors

Access: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00360

A Primer for Pharmaceutical Process Development Chemists and Analysts in Relation to Impurities Perceived to Be Mutagenic or “Genotoxic”

Access: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.0c00343

A Kinetics-Based Approach for the Assignment of Reactivity Purge Factors

Access: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.5b00257

Risk Assessment Study of Nitrosamines for the API Temozolomide Industrial Process

https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00487

7 Likes

Thank you Naiffer_Host

it is really helpful to have all these refs summarized!!!

1 Like