https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022354926002832
Abstract
Nitrosamine impurities, owing to their established carcinogenic potential, represent a significant challenge in contemporary pharmaceutical development. Regulatory expectations have evolved rapidly, with stringent requirements for their identification, control, and risk assessment. Under ICH M7(R2), N‑nitrosamines are classified within the “cohort of concern” (CoC), necessitating compound‑specific acceptable intake (AI) limits, while the forthcoming ICH M7(R3) addendum aims to harmonize these assessments through standardized AI values and structured quality risk management frameworks. Although initial regulatory efforts focused on marketed products, recent guidance now extends these expectations to early‑phase clinical development, introducing additional complexity for pharmaceutical developers.
Translational Pharmaceutics integrates real‑time formulation development, GMP manufacturing, and clinical testing within a single adaptive protocol. When applied to the rapid formulation development and clinical testing of commercial-intent formulations, programs typically incorporate a formulation design space to facilitate the prospective optimisation of formulations using clinical data. Embedding nitrosamine risk assessment within a defined design space represents a key operational advantage, as it enables real‑time, evidence‑based control of nitrosamine risk during formulation development rather than retrospective assessment. All formulation variants explored clinically within the predetermined design space are encompassed by a single, adaptive nitrosamine risk assessment strategy, thereby avoiding multiple regulatory amendments typically required in conventional, sequential approaches whilst maintaining flexibility in formulation choice.